References

Chapter 4

Main Text
■ Adewusi, H. 2004. “Potential for Development and Conservation of Dacryodes edulisin Sakpoba Forest Reserve, Edo State, in the Niger Delta Area of Nigeria.” In Forest Products, Livelihoods and Conservation: Case-Studies of Non-Timber Forest Product Systems,eds. T. Sunderland and O. Ndoye, 133-147. Bogor, Indonesia: Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). Online at http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/ publications/pdf_files/Books/NTFPAfrica/Chapter7-Chapter13.PDF.
■ Agarwal, A., and S. Narain. 1999. “Community and Household Water Management: The Key to Environmental Regeneration and Poverty Alleviation.” Presented at EUUNDP Conference, Brussels, February 1999. Online at http://www.undp.org/seed/pei/ publication/water.pdf.
■ Alden Wily, L., and S. Mbaya. 2001. Land, People and Forests in Eastern and Southern Africa at the Beginning of the 21st Century: The Impact of Land Relations on the Role of Communities in Forest Future.Nairobi: IUCN-EARO. Online at http://www.iucn.org/ places/earo/pubs/forest/LANDPEOP.PDF.
■ Bacon, C. 2002. “The Story of Nicaragua’s Coffee Quality Improvement Project: An Independent Evaluation for Thanksgiving Coffee Company.” Online at http://www.agroecology.org/people/chrisbacon/summary.pdf.
■ Barber, C., and V. Pratt. 1997. Sullied Seas: Strategies for Combating Cyanide Fishing in Southeast Asia and Beyond. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute and International Marinelife Alliance. Online at http://pubs.wri.org/pubs_description .cfm?PubID=2770.
■ Bruce, J., M. Freudenberger, and T. Ngaido. 1995. Old Wine in New Bottles: Creating New Institutions for Local Land Management. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ). Online at http://www2.gtz.de/dokumente/bib/00-0590.pdf.
■ Carter, M. 2003. “Designing Land and Property Rights Reform for Poverty Alleviation and Food Security.” Land Reform2003(2):45-57. Online at ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/ 006/j0415T/j0415T00.pdf.
■ Chater, S. 2003. “Balancing Rainforest Conservation and Poverty Reduction.” ASB Policy Brief 5. Nairobi, Kenya: Alternatives to Slash and Burn Programme. Online at http://www.asb.cgiar.org/PDFwebdocs/Policybrief5..pdf.
■ Deininger, K. 2003. Land Policies for Growth and Poverty Reduction.Washington, DC and Oxford: The World Bank and Oxford University Press.
■ Elbow, K., R. Furth, A. Knox, K. Bohrer, M. Hobbs, S. Leisz, and M. Williams. 1998. “Synthesis of Trends and Issues Raised by Land Tenure Country Profiles of West African Countries, 1996.” In Country Profiles of Land Tenure: Africa 1996,ed. J. Bruce, 2-18. Research Paper No. 130. Madison, Wisconsin: Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin. Online at http://agecon.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/pdf_view.pl?paperid=1153&ftype=.pdf.
■ Fernandez, A. 2003. People’s Institutions Managing Natural Resources in the Context of a Watershed Strategy.Bangalore, India: MYRADA.
■ Fitter, R., and R. Kaplinsky. 2001. Who Gains from Product Rents as the Coffee Market Becomes More Differentiated? A Value Chain Analysis.IDS Bulletin Paper. Sussex, UK: Institute of Development Studies (IDS), University of Sussex. Online at http://www.ids.ac.uk/ ids/global/pdfs/productrents.pdf.
■ Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2002a. Land Tenure and Rural Development.FAO Land Tenure Studies No. 3. Rome: FAO. Online at ftp://ftp.fao.org/ docrep/fao/005/y4307E/y4307E00.pdf.
■ Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2002b. Information on Fisheries Management in Samoa. FAO Country Profiles and Mapping Information System. Rome: FAO. Online at http://www.fao.org/fi/fcp/en/WSM/body.htm.
■ Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2005. Milk and Dairy Products, Post-Harvest Losses and Food Safety in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Near East (PFL).Website. Online at http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/projects/en/pfl/home.html.
■ Gabriel, A., and B. Hundie. 2004. Farmers’ Post-Harvest Grain Management Choices Under Liquidity Constraints and Impending Risks: Implications for Achieving Food Security Objectives in Ethiopia.Presented at the Second International Conference on the Ethiopian Economy, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, June 3-5, 2004. Online at http://eeaecon.org/ EEA/conferences/papers/Abebe%20HaileGabriel%20and%20Bekele%20Hunde% 20-%20postharvest_abebe.pdf.
■ Gresser, C., and S. Tickell. 2002. Mugged. Poverty in Your Coffee Cup. Oxfam International. Online at http://www.maketradefair.com/assets/english/mugged.pdf.
■ Grieg-Gran, M., and J. Bishop. 2004. “How Can Markets for Ecosystem Services Benefit the Poor?” In The Millennium Development Goals and Conservation—Managing Nature’s Wealth for Society’s Health,ed. D. Roe, 55-72. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). Online at http://www.iied.org/docs/mdg/ MDG2-ch4.pdf.
■ International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). 2004. Rural Finance Policy. Rome: IFAD. Online at http://www.ifad.org/pub/basic/finance/ENG.pdf.
■ International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). 2003. Milk and Dairy Products, Post- Harvest Losses and Food Safety in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Near East—Regional Approaches to National Challenges. Phase 1 Synthesis Report. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Online at http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/ projects/en/pfl/documents.html.
■ Kellert, S., J. Mehta, S. Ebbin, and L. Lichtenfeld. 2000. “Community Natural Resource Management: Promise, Rhetoric, and Reality.” Society and Natural Resources13:705- 715. Online at http://www.ksu.edu/bsanderc/avianecology/kellert2000.pdf.
■ Kerr, J. 2002a. “Watershed Development, Environmental Services, and Poverty Alleviation in India.” World Development30(8):1387-1400.
■ Kerr, J. 2002b. “Sharing the Benefits of Watershed Management in Sukhomajri, India.” In Selling Forest Environmental Services: Market-based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development, eds. S. Pagiola, J. Bishop and N. Landell-Mills, 53-63. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
■ Kerr, J., G. Pangare, and V. Pangare. 2002. Watershed Development Projects in India: An Evaluation.Research Report 127. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Online at http://www.ifpri.org/pubs/abstract/127/rr127.pdf.
■ King, M., and U. Fa’asili. 1999. “Community-Based Management of Subsistence Fisheries in Samoa.” Fisheries Management and Ecology(6):133-144.
■ Kumar, S. 2002. “Does Participation in Common Pool Resource Management Help the Poor? A Social Cost-Benefit Analysis of Joint Forest Management in Jharkhand, India.” World Development30(5):763-782.
■ Landell-Mills, N., and I. Porras. 2002. Silver Bullet or Fools’ Gold? A Global Review of Markets for Forest Environmental Services and Their Impact on the Poor. Instruments for Sustainable Private Sector Forestry Series. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). Online at http://www.iied.org/ docs/flu/psf/psf_silvbullet.pdf.
■ Manasseh, K., and G. Chopra. 2004. “India: World Bank Supports National Highway Systems Improvements in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.” World Bank News Release #251, December 21. Washington, DC: Online at http://www.worldbank.org.in/WBSITE/ EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/SOUTHASIAEXT/INDIAEXTN/0,,contentMDK:20298357~ menuPK:295603~pagePK:141137~piPK:141127~theSitePK:295584,00.html.
■ Marshall, E., A. Newton, and K. Schreckenberg. 2003. “Commercialisation of Non- Timber Forest Products: First Steps in Analysing the Factors Influencing Success.” International Forestry Review5(2):128-137.
■ May, P. 1992. “Building Institutions and Markets for Non-Wood Forest Products from the Brazilian Amazon.” Unasylva: International Journal of Forestry and Forest Industries, 42. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Online at http://www.fao.org/documents/show_cdr.asp?url_file=/docrep/u2440E/u2440E00.htm.
■ Mayers, J., and S. Vermeulen. 2002. Company-Community Forestry Partnerships: From Raw Deals to Mutual Gains?Instruments for Sustainable Private Sector Forestry Series. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). Online at http://www.poptel.org.uk/iied/docs/flu/psf_cmpny_prtnrship.pdf.
■ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). 2005a. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis Report.Washington, DC: Island Press.
■ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). 2005b. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis.Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
■ Miranda, M., I. Porras, and M. Moreno. 2003. The Social Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services in Costa Rica. A Quantitative Field Survey and Analysis of the Virilla Watershed. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). Online at http://www.iied.org/eep/pubs/documents/MES1.pdf.
■ Morduch, J., and B. Haley. 2002. Analysis of the Effects of Microfinance on Poverty Reduction.NYU Wagner Working Paper No. 1014. New York: New York University. Online at http://www.nyu.edu/wagner/public_html/cgi-bin/workingPapers/wp1014.pdf.
■ Morris, J. 2002. Bitter Bamboo and Sweet Living: Impacts of NTFP Conservation Activities on Poverty Alleviation and Sustainable Livelihoods.Prepared for IUCN’s 31-C Project on Poverty Alleviation, Livelihood Improvement and Ecosystem Management. IUCN The World Conservation Union. Online at http://www.iucn.org/themes/fcp/ publications/files/3ic_cs_lao.pdf.
■ Munsiari, S. 2003. “WAIGA: A Journey from Local Initiative to Van Panchayat.” Working Paper 1. Anand, India: Foundation for Ecological Security (FES).
■ Neumann, R., and E. Hirsch. 2000. Commercialisation of Non-Timber Forest Products: Review and Analysis of Research. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). Online at http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/pdf_files/mgntfp3.pdf.
■ Pagiola, S. 2002. “Paying for Water Services in Central America: Learning from Costa Rica.” In Selling Forest Environmental Services: Market-Based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development,eds. S. Pagiola, J. Bishop and N. Landell-Mills, 31-51. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
■ Pagiola, S., A. Arcenas, and G. Platais. 2003. “Ensuring the Poor Benefit from Systems of Payments for Environmental Services.” Presented at the Workshop on Reconciling Rural Poverty Reduction and Resource Conservation: Identifying Relationships and Remedies. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, May 2-3, 2003.
■ Reddy, V., M. Reddy, S. Galab, J. Soussan, and O. Springate-Baginski. 2004. “Participatory Watershed Development in India: Can it Sustain Rural Livelihoods?” Development and Change35(2):297-326. 241
■ Ribot, J. 1998. “Theorizing Access: Forest Profits Along Senegal’s Charcoal Commodity Chain.” Development and Change(29):307-341.
■ Riddell, J. 2000. Contemporary Thinking on Land Reform.SD-Dimensions. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Online at http://www.caledonia.org .uk/land/fao.htm.
■ Rodriguez, C. 2004. “The Environmental Services Payment Program: An Alternative to Financial Sustainability for Sustainable Development.” PowerPoint Presentation. Costa Rica Ministry of Environment and Energy.
■ Rosa, H., S. Kandel, and L. Dimas. 2003. Compensation for Environmental Services and Rural Communities: Lessons from the Americas and Key Issues for Strengthening Community Strategies. San Salvador: The Salvadoran Research Program on Development and Environment (PRISMA). Online at http://www.prisma.org.sv/pubs/ CES_RC_En.pdf.
■ Samperio, D. 2002. A Fair Grind: Mexico. New York: UNDP Equator Initiative. Online at http://www.tve.org/ho/doc.cfm?aid=910.
■ Scherr, S., A. White, and D. Kaimowitz. 2002. Making Markets Work for Forest Communities.Washington, DC and Bogor, Indonesia: Forest Trends and Center for International Forestry Research.
■ Scherr, S., A. White, and D. Kaimowitz. 2003. A New Agenda for Forest Conservation and Poverty Reduction: Making Forest Markets Work for Low-Income Producers. Washington, DC: Forest Trends. Online at http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/ pdf_files/Books/A%20New%20Agenda.pdf.
■ Shanley, P., A. Pierce, S. Laird, and S. Guillen. 2002. Tapping the Green Market: Management and Certification of Non-Timber Forest Products.Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
■ Shyamsundar, P., E. Araral, and S. Weerartne. 2004. Devolution of Resource Rights, Poverty, and Natural Resource Management—A Review. Environment Department Paper No. 104. Washington, DC: World Bank.
■ Southey, S. 2004. Project Documentation, Kalinga Mission for Indigenous Children and Youth Development, Inc. (KAMICYDI). UNDP Equator Initiative. Online at http://www.globalgiving.com/pfil/774/projdoc.doc.
■ Tognetti, S. 2001. Creating Incentives for River Basin Management as a Conservation Strategy—A Survey of the Literature and Existing Initiatives.Washington, DC: WWF-US.
■ United Nations Housing Rights Programme (UNHRP). 2005. Indigenous Peoples’ Right to Adequate Housing: A Global Overview. Report No. 7. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme. Online athttp://www.unhabitat.org/ programmes/housingpolicy/pubvul.asp
■ United States Agency for International Development (USAID). 2004. USAID Quality Coffee Program Helps Gain Fame for Nicaraguan Coffee and Higher Incomes for Farmers.USAID Nicaragua. Online at http://www.usaid.org.ni/ssoct04_1.html.
■ United States Agency for International Development (USAID). 2005. Natural Resource Management in Namibia.Website. Online at www.usaid.org.na/project.asp?proid=3#top.
■ Waldman, L., with contributions from A. Ballance, R. Benítez Ramos, A. Gadzekpo, O. Mugyenyi, Q. Nguyen, G. Tumushabe, and H. Stewart. 2005. Environment, Politics, and Poverty: Lessons from a Review of PRSP Stakeholder Perspectives. Synthesis Review. Study initiated under the Poverty and Environment Partnership (PEP) and jointly funded and managed by CIDA, DFID, and GTZ.
■ White, A., and A. Martin. 2002. Who Owns the World’s Forests?Washington, DC: Forest Trends and Center for International Environmental Law. Online at http://www.cbnrm.net/ pdf/white_a_001_foresttenure.pdf.
■ World Resources Institute (WRI). 2005. “FOODNET Uganda.” Digital Dividend Project Summary. Washington, DC: WRI. Online at http://wriws1.digitaldividend.org/wri/ app/navigate?_action=opencapsule&_form=default&dbId=1602801%3afcc3edcad7% 3a-7fd2%3a3f-692c-7.
■ World Resources Institute (WRI), United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Environment Programme, and World Bank. 2003. World Resources 2002-2004: Decisions for the Earth—Balance, Voice, and Power.Washington, DC: WRI. Online at http://governance.wri.org/pubs_description.cfm?PubID=3764.

Box 4.1
■ Capitania del Alto y Bajo Izogog (CABI). 2004. “Equator Prize Submission to UN Development Program’s Equator Initiative.” Santa Cruz: CABI.
■ Noss, A. 2005. Conservation Zoologist and Coordinator, Chaco Landscape program, Wildlife Conservation Society. Personal Communication. E-mail. April 18, 21, 2005.
■ Roach, J. 2004. “Unique Bolivia Park Begun by Indigenous People.” National Geographic News(January 13, 2004). Online at http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/ 2001/0113_040113_chacopark.html.
■ Winer, N. 2003. “Co-Management of Protected Areas, the Oil and Gas Industry and Indigenous Empowerment—The Experience of Bolivia’s Kaa-Iya del Gran Chaco.” Policy Matters12:181-191.
■ Winer, N. 2001. “Bolivia Case Study: Kaa Iya del Gran Chaco.” Report prepared for IUCN The World Conservation Union.

Box 4.2
■ Bacon, C. 2005. “Confronting the Coffee Crisis: Can Fair Trade, Organic, and Specialty Coffees Reduce Small-Scale Farmer Vulnerability in Northern Nicaragua?” World Development33(3):497-511.
■ Darjeeling Ladenla Road Prerna (RCDC). 1996. Economic and Social Survey Report on Dabaipani, Harsing and Yangkhoo.Darjeeling, India: RCDC.
■ Down to Earth. 2004. “24/7 Water Supply.” Down to Earth(August 15):44.
■ Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International (FLO). 2004. “Fairtrade Standards for Coffee.” Online at http://www.fairtrade.net/pdf/sp/english/Coffee%20SP% 20versionJune04.pdf.
■ Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International (FLO). 2005. “Facts and Figures.” FLO website. Online at http://www.fairtrade.net/sites/impact/facts.html.
■ Howard, K. 2005. Sales Manager, Equal Exchange. Personal Communication. Interview. January 5, 2005.
■ International Coffee Organization (ICO). 2005. Historical Data: Prices Paid to Growers in Exporting Member Countries (Monthly).Database. Online at http://www.ico.org/ historical.asp.
■ Murray, D., L. Raynolds, and P. Taylor. 2003. One Cup at a Time: Poverty Alleviation and Fair Trade Coffee in Latin America.Fort Collins, Colorado: Colorado State University, Fair Trade Research Group. Online at http://www.colostate.edu/Depts/Sociology/ FairTradeResearchGroup/.
■ Rice, R. 2001. Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center. Personal Communication. E-mail. June 11, 2001.
■ Taylor, P. 2002. Poverty Alleviation Through Participation in Fair Trade Coffee Networks: Synthesis of Case Study Research Question Findings.Fort Collins, Colorado: Colorado State University and the Community and Resource Development Program, Ford Foundation. Online at http://www.colostate.edu/Depts/Sociology/FairTradeResearchGroup/ doc/pete.pdf.
■ Tea Promoters of India (TPI). 1999. “Small Farmers Scheme, Mineral Springs, Dabaipani: Yearly Report.” Calcutta, India: TPI.
■ Valencia, A. 2001. “Birds and Beans: The Changing Face of Coffee Production.” EarthTrends, Features. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Online at http://earthtrends.wri.org/pdf_library/features/bio_fea_coffee.pdf.
■ Young, G. 2003. Fair Trade’s Influential Past and the Challenges of its Future.Brussels, Belgium: King Baudouin Foundation. Online at http://www.kbs-frb.be.

Box 4.3
■ Annamalai, K., and S. Rao. 2003. What Works: ITC’s e-Choupal and Profitable Rural Transformation.Washington, DC: World Resources Institute (WRI).
■ e-Choupal. 2005. e-Choupal Website. ITC Ltd. Online at http://www.echoupal.com/.

Box 4.4
■ Echavarría, M. 2002. Water User Associations in the Cauca Valley: A Voluntary Mechanism to Promote Upstream-Downstream Cooperation in the Protection of Rural Watersheds. Land-Water Linkages in Rural Watersheds Case Study Series. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Online at http://www .fao.org/ag/agl/watershed/watershed/papers/papercas/paperen/colombia.pdf
■ IUCN The World Conservation Union. 2003. “Chiapas, Mexico.” IUCN, Global Partnership on Forest Landscape Restoration. Online at http://www.unep-wcmc.org/forest/ restoration/globalpartnership/docs/Mexico.pdf.
■ Phillips, G., G. Hellier, and R. Tipper. 2002. The Plan Vivo System: Verification Status Review.Edinburgh, UK: The Edinburgh Centre for Carbon Management, Ltd. Online at http://www.eccm.uk.com/climafor/PVS%20Verification%20Report.PDF.
■ Rosa, H., S. Kandel, and L. Dimas. 2003. Compensation for Environmental Services and Rural Communities: Lessons from the Americas and Key Issues for Strengthening Community Strategies. San Salvador: The Salvadoran Research Program on Development and Environment (PRISMA). Online at http://www.prisma.org.sv/pubs/ CES_RC_En.pdf.
■ Scherr, S., A. White, A. Khare, M. Inbar, and A. Molar. 2004. For Services Rendered: The Current Status and Future Potential of Markets for the Ecosystem Services Provided by Tropical Forests. ITTO Technical Series No. 21. International Tropical Timber Organization. Online at http://www.itto.or.jp/live/Live_Server/724/TS21e.pdf.

Box 4.5
■ Annamalai, K., and S. Rao. 2003. What Works: ITC’s e-Choupal and Profitable Rural Transformation.Washington, DC: World Resources Institute (WRI).
■ Aulisi, A., A. Farrell, J. Pershing, and S. VanDeveer. 2005. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading in U.S. States: Observations and Lessons from the OTC NOx Budget Program. WRI White Paper. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Online at http://pdf.wri.org/ nox_ghg.pdf.
■ Ellerman, A., P. Joskow, R. Schmalensee, J. Montero, and E. Bailey. 2000. Markets for Clean Air: the U.S. Acid Rain Program.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
■ International Energy Agency (IEA). 2004. World Energy Outlook 2004. Paris: IEA.
■ Kura, Y., C. Revenga, E. Hoshino, and G. Mock. 2004. Fishing for Answers: Making Sense of the Global Fish Crisis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Online at http://pubs.wri.org/pubs_description.cfm?PubID=3866.
■ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis.Washington, DC: Island Press. Online at http://www.millenniumassessment.org/ en/products.aspx.
■ National Research Council (NRC). 1999. Sharing the Fish: Toward a National Policy on Individual Fishing Quotas.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
■ Soros, G. 2005. “Transparency Can Alleviate Poverty.” Financial Times(March 17):43
■ World Trade Organization (WTO). 2003. Annual Report 2003.Geneva: WTO. Online at http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/annual_report_e.htm.
■ World Wildlife Fund (WWF). 2005. AREAS Project: Technology.WWF. Online at http:// www.worldwildlifefund.org/action/areasproject/technology.cfm.